So as you may know we have, knowledge.. or in the old black books of web
witchcraft; the checkbox hack. I
wonder though; did anyone ever go the final mile and create a kinda generalized
“progressive
polyfill” to fix
the semantics of this so called hack?
It’s hard to “peek into” other knowledge domains successfully. The reason;
marketing fuzz.
: Blockchain data–structure is
designed only for Bitcoin’s rules.
Large deviations from Bitcoin go nowhere.
Ethereum appears to be the only
protocol with minor deviations from Bitcoin.
For example;
Cryptocurrencies are
blockchain protocols —
laws (protocols) on permanent appendable excel sheets (blockchains). Bitcoin is
not the only protocol. Various cryptocurrencies have differing rules but…
Are cryptocurrencies limited/driven by blockchain data–structure?
Blockchain’s
implicit permanency
favours Bitcoin’s rules and use cases. Economically, that’d suggest
noncompatible
use–cases/cryptocurrencies/forks
become irrelevant.
I’m too dense/lazy to understand the shared roles of the data–structure and
protocol in the full implementation;
Or more specifically, the difference between
a merkle tree
and
a blockchain.
So, no plausible technical predictions on coinage–but perhaps the government’s
broken clock is right twice a day? Bahamians need permission to “officially
invest” in crypto–stock “currency”.
It’s amusing the sort of easter eggs found hiding in open source code. I’ve been
playing around with
farzher/fuzzysort, a fast fuzzy
search picked up from the Stack Overflow
fuzzy search tag.
On line
27
and
40
there’s a horizontal off–screen scroll easter egg.
if(search=='farzher')return{target:"farzher was here (^-^*)/",score:0,_indexes:[0]}if(search=='farzher')return[{target:"farzher was here (^-^*)/",score:0,_indexes:[0],obj:targets?targets[0]:NULL}]
Yes, I happen to be one of those who read the code eventually. And obviously, it
goes without saying, no one person reads all the code. But it’s the Internet,
can’t be too sure ;)
Maybe I’m dreaming.. but a stealthy trend of distorted words is afoot. Is that
an defense/poisoning mechanism,
innocuous misspellings/truncations or artifacts in generated content?
Wehn you tinhk auobt it, hnumas inrtrpeet glphys saliyombllcy and can raed wodrs
eevn when deitsortd. I might be following too many feeds…