I came across a good
article on finding video feed links
from various (mostly western) sites. Odysee links have a funky format that are
prefixed with https://odysee.com/$/rss + channel.
And… as a pretend expert :) started wondering: In the big bad messy real world
(super serious business), how does one on such a decentralized (social) network
thoroughly:
Block specific users from viewing
Block specific users from following
Block specific users from interacting
Delete previous local/remote content from specific users following
Delete previous local/remote interactions from specific users interacting
ActivityPub is an
open/transparent protocol (amazing) but for adoption, the expectation/reality of
many users online anywhere (even public networks) is favourable discoverability
not discoverability itself… however contradictory/debatable. That’s probably
easy/possible centralized but stupid hard/impossible decentralized.
The IndieWeb’s
is a rather
sophisticated syndication philosophy. Too bad I’ve
got such a disdain for social media that I’d never explore it personally. It’s a
good approach for working on other people’s stuff though: think Facebook’s
(Meta)
instant RSS articles
(dies April 2023),
podcast feeds, or any other (kinda) bi–directional site syndication mechanism.
The hypothetical outcomes/incentives of POSSE if it was done by everyone is an
entertaining thought experiment.
It seems that.. from talking to a few people via email, basic feed discovery
with
rel alternates
are ineffective. Simple redirects work better for organic discovery.
I was reading web.dev recently and couldn’t help but
think that in tech circles/articles online it’s easy to get the impression that
Firefox is a major competing
browser. Firefox actually doesn’t even register. Firefox has an estimated 3%
points in
global market–share and
doesn’t even show up in
mobile market–share
estimates.
Users implicitly use Safari (Apple) and/or some derivation of Chromium (Google
Chrome). When was the last time you saw someone
using Firefox? Not recently if you’re outside the tech bubble.
Of course in my case the
social media applications
within the Fediverse are not what’s most interesting. It’s the generality of its
protocol. ActivityPub appears to have an
easier time with different use cases than other protocols.
The link to a Fediverse server list in a previous post died but
fediverse.party also shows the diverse types of
applications that use the ActivityPub protocol.
Insularity is
a term that shows up in the philosophy of the
Fediverse every so often. Generally, the more insular
a community, the more populous/extreme/niche. Some Fediverse indexes calculate
insularity rates.
Imagine similar stats for the . Like — what’s
the and domain linking insularity
within/between Facebook relative to other
small/large islands?
That would be extraordinary, especially for journalism which is pretty much
dead.
This goes without saying but… any sufficiently ambitious group of business
persons want more than just to be on the Internet, they want to own it
completely, the Fediverse is no exception :)
$ check-jsonschema --schemafile jsonfeed-v1.1.json feed.json
ok -- validation done
The upside of the Feed is a lot
more human than technical in the sense that it’s a mapping of
/Atom to the
world. There are many people who prefer JSON over
.
if anyone tells you that
is dead — they’re in a bubble.
Bing is our witness; the
hasfeed: prefix returns sites
with a feed, the feed: prefix
gives a direct feed link. No… I’m not a secret Microsoft™ agent —
DuckDuckGo and others support this too
;-) 38B+ are big boy numbers.