I caught a glimpse of an interesting thing by chance.
Meta Platforms
Facebook hid the x
from their login prompt on
public pages–including government pages, then brought it back. ‘Twas on the
desktop before mobile and perhaps (who knows) for a subset (as a test). A “login
only public page” is for a near–distant future, set. Seriously though;
developer documentation will become my
final excuse to visit Facebook.
I came across a good
article on finding video feed links
from various (mostly western) sites. Odysee links have a funky format that are
prefixed with https://odysee.com/$/rss
+ channel.
So this (channel):
https://odysee.com/@andkos.music:1
Becomes this (feed):
https://odysee.com/$/rss/@andkos.music:1
I poked around the Activity Stream docs a while back.
And… as a pretend expert :) started wondering: In the big bad messy real world (super serious business), how does one on such a decentralized (social) network thoroughly:
- Block specific users from viewing
- Block specific users from following
- Block specific users from interacting
- Delete previous local/remote content from specific users following
- Delete previous local/remote interactions from specific users interacting
ActivityPub is an open/transparent protocol (amazing) but for adoption, the expectation/reality of many users online anywhere (even public networks) is favourable discoverability not discoverability itself… however contradictory/debatable. That’s probably easy/possible centralized but stupid hard/impossible decentralized.
The IndieWeb’s is a rather sophisticated syndication philosophy. Too bad I’ve got such a disdain for social media that I’d never explore it personally. It’s a good approach for working on other people’s stuff though: think Facebook’s (Meta) instant RSS articles (dies April 2023), podcast feeds, or any other (kinda) bi–directional site syndication mechanism.
The hypothetical outcomes/incentives of POSSE if it was done by everyone is an entertaining thought experiment.