Learn about the latest web technology updates in Safari Technology Preview: CSS, Layout, JavaScript, Media, Popover, and Accessibility.
Open Source Web Browser Engine
Another wandering soul whispering into the void. If you are looking for my blog you are in the wrong place. The profile and header pictures are brought to you by cdd20.
So, I’ve been thinking (uh-oh).. there’s this idea/law by Melvin Conway (popular in programming books) that goes something like this;
Any organization that designs a system will produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization’s communication structure.
Many suns ago, local events “piqued” my curiosity into cryptocurrency hype. Praise be to the king–no really! Anyway, reading the leaves and decrypting the crypto–babble made bits of sense… at least superficially.
The point: there’s plausibility that one or many powerful democratic government(s) designed/orchestrated the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Yes, hard to prove but… the architecture is an uncanny 1:1 copy of government communication. Even abuse/failure modes are 1:1 (see sybil, a 51% attack: similar to democracy’s extra fun “limbo” mode).
Another wandering soul whispering into the void. If you are looking for my blog you are in the wrong place. The profile and header pictures are brought to you by cdd20.
I’d have never peeked so deeply into cryptocurrency lore..
..if it wasn’t for this guy visiting my country. I am now “enlightened”. Spoiler: Blockchain protocols computationally formalize/describe a government’s high power restraints within democracy. In civics (social studies), democracy is decentralized power (no/many kings) and therefore implicitly inefficient.
Democratic governments (in perfect world) communicate/act/bank;
- In public (freedom of information)
- With immutability (no deleting things)
- With consensus (majority vote)
- With inefficiency (to weaken bad actors)
Citizens and other low power (centralized) entities can do some of the above (federation), but mostly (wisely) communicate/act/bank;
- In private (freedom of association)
- With mutability (to protect privacy)
- Without consensus (freedom of expression)
- With efficiency (to build–up fast actors)
Individually, (5-8 > 1-4) no? But (1-4 > 5-8) in dictatorships (5-8)? Blockchain governments for maximal oversight? Not happening :)
Bing's Homepage Images Archive
Natural Bridges State Beach in Santa Cruz, California (© Jim Patterson/Tandem Stills + Motion)
Index: Cache · Source
Recently published RFCs
This document deprecates the use of any “int” domain names that were designated for infrastructure purposes by the IETF, and it identifies
Recently published RFCs
This document specifies a certificate extension for including logotypes in public key certificates and attribute certificates. This
Bing's Homepage Images Archive
Canoeing in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge, Georgia (© Brad Beck/Tandem Stills + Motion)
Index: Cache · Source
Do you want to cancel? – YES / CANCEL
nikitonsky: Click targets should be as big as possible. Just text itself it too small.
Bing's Homepage Images Archive
Morro Jable and Playa del Matorral, Fuerteventura, Canary Islands, Spain (© Gavin Hellier/Getty Images)
Index: Cache · Source
Bing's Homepage Images Archive
White-tailed deer doe and newborn fawn, Montana (© Donald M. Jones/Minden Pictures)
Index: Cache · Source